Permitting & community
For energy developers
A month of delay erodes $190M.
Bring the math to the hearing.
Independent, peer-reviewed impact data that holds up at hearings, in RFPs, and in front of lenders and investors. TotalView quantifies the public health, ecosystem, water, and economic value of every project — every hour of every year — so delay, opposition, and diligence don’t decide the outcome.
- NSF-Funded Methodology
- ISO 14040/14044-Aligned
- Peer-Reviewed
- WEF Global Case Study
- 100% Project Success Rate
Existing risk
- of applications canceled
-
33%
of applications canceled
- face 6+ month delays
-
50%
face 6+ month delays
- lost per MW per delay
-
$200K
lost per MW per delay
Berkeley Lab’s 2024 study of utility-scale interconnection found that half of new projects face 6+ month delays, and that one in three applications gets canceled outright. Every additional month of delay on a typical 950 MW project erodes roughly $190 million of value. The cheapest place to protect a project is upstream of the hearing.
- Community opposition without independent counter-evidence
- RFP responses that compete only on price per MWh
- Lender and investor diligence on environmental risk
- No defensible answer when claims are challenged at hearing
What TotalView delivers
The receipts every developer eventually needs.
Independent, ISO-aligned, peer-reviewed analysis. The same dataset answers a permit reviewer, a community advocate, an RFP scoring committee, and a credit committee — without recutting the math.
14
Life cycle impact categories
8,760
Hourly data points per year
100%
U.S. balancing authorities
30-yr
Cumulative lifecycle view
How it supports your project
Four answers, one analysis.
RFP differentiation
Tailor the pitch to where the offtaker actually sits.
Lender & investor diligence
Bring receipts to credit committee.
Hourly impact certificates
Defensible value beyond a single carbon number.
Where it matters
Take it into the rooms where decisions get made.
2,290 GW sit in the U.S. interconnection queue. 55 months is the new average wait. The projects that move are the ones that show up to every decision moment with defensible math.
Corporate RFP · against four same-priced bids
Quote buyer-location-specific avoided impact.
Marginal emissionality varies up to 380% across the U.S. grid. Show an Ohio offtaker different DALY/MWh numbers than a Wisconsin offtaker — both peer-reviewed, both defensible to their 24/7 CFE matching committee.
Contested permit · NEPA / state SEPA
Attach a peer-reviewed county-level impact table.
DALY, species·yr, and water damages allocated to the actual receptor counties. Survives the comment period, the public hearing, and the inevitable cross-examination from local opposition.
Sustainability-linked construction loan
Price the KPI step-down on third-party-verified avoided-DALY/MWh.
SLL volumes crossed $500B in 2025. Step-downs price on third-party-verified ESG metrics. TotalView’s peer-reviewed methodology stands up to the verifier and translates into basis-point savings on construction debt.
Community benefit agreement
Bring dollar-denominated host-county benefits to the table.
California AB 205, Michigan PA 233, and the Massachusetts CBA Guidelines (March 2026) all expect quantified community impact in writing. Show host-county hospitalizations prevented, water saved, ecosystem damage avoided — in dollars.
Tax-credit transfer pricing · IRA §6418
Defend the transfer price under reputational screening.
Section 6418 buyers increasingly screen credit packages for reputational risk before closing. Attach peer-reviewed avoided-impact (DALYs, species·yr, USD damages prevented) to the credit package — and price the package at the premium it earns.
Proven track record
Independent data that holds up anywhere.
Independent validation
Recognized by global institutions. Trusted by leading developers.
- NSF-funded, ISO 14040/14044-aligned methodology
- Featured as a World Economic Forum global case study
- 100% project success rate across utility-scale power projects facing organized opposition
- Peer-reviewed methodology drawing on leading LCI databases and ReCiPe 2016 hierarchist
What you take away
Permit-ready, RFP-ready, board-ready.
- Full TotalView impact analysis across 14 life cycle categories
- Permit-ready Technical Report for application submission
- RFP attachment quantifying co-benefits beyond price per MWh
- Lender / investor brief with propagated uncertainty
- Hearing deck and one-page community summary
- 12-month dynamic platform access with shareable dashboards
How it works
Three steps. From agreement to deployable evidence.
-
Execute agreement
Align on project capacity, technology, siting, and the audiences your impact analysis needs to reach — permitting, RFP, investor, community.
-
Analysis delivered in TotalView
Hourly grid-displaced lifecycle impact across 14 categories, with peer-reviewed methodology and propagated uncertainty.
-
Deploy with confidence
Permit-ready Technical Reports, hearing decks, RFP attachments, and investor briefs. Expert support during review.
Bring us a project. We’ll bring the receipts.
Tell us about a single project or a pipeline. Thirty minutes. We’ll show you the analysis your permit, your RFP, and your credit committee actually need.
No deck. Just a working session.